“Point to that verbiage… if you’re using a vendor regularly… calling them non-GAAP… would be pretty reasonable”

FP&A Today · Would Your FP&A Forecast Survive an Audit? | Norm Osumi

Play from 25:37
25:37

Audio streams from the publisher’s own feed. Verbatim does not host or copy it.

What was described

Use SEC non-GAAP guidance to justify excluding non-recurring expenses from adjusted EBITDA

Said nearby on the same subject

“Their favorite number is called NPAT-A ... it completely excludes these costs ... I think that is the most ridiculous use of an adjusted accounting metric.”
♫
Said on The Contrarians with Adam and Adir
Why it worked $1.2 billion cost excluded, metric called NPAT-A Share this moment
“I very rarely see a situation where I think this justifies high... Those are very expensive modes”
DS
Dave Slutzkin
The Startup Podcast ·
How they work Share this moment
“A 53% adjusted EBITDA margin ... 84% of their revenue comes from recurring subscriptions.”
♫
Said on Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing
Why it worked 53% EBITDA margin, 84% recurring revenue Share this moment
“You can instill that, you have to give them the guidance. Use property-based testing, use metamorphic testing, ... deterministic simulation testing.”
PM
Peter Mattis
The Pragmatic Engineer ·
Why it worked Share this moment

Moments like this, every Monday

The strongest new moments on your topics, in the speakers' own words. Free for three topics.

No card. No password. One-click unsubscribe.

Track a competitor?

Pro watches up to 25 names or phrases and emails you the morning after they are said.

See Pro, $29 a month

Verbatim quotes a short extract and links to the episode; the episode belongs to its publisher. Remove a show.