“When they come out of oral argument… they take a vote at a secret meeting… if the chief justice is in the majority, he gets to assign the opinion.”
SC
Supreme Court clerk speaker
Bloomberg Law ·
“Maybe… there’s an oral component… where we ask them to explain how they’ve arrived at those conclusions.”
Australia Overnight · From the Summary Podcast - Rethinking Exams in the Age of AI
Play from 5:01
5:01
Audio streams from the publisher’s own feed. Verbatim does not host or copy it.
What was described
suggests adding an oral component to take-home assignments where students must explain how they arrived at conclusions
Said nearby on the same subject
“We do audit logs, but now in the agentic world, we have to also give more insights why an agent arrived to a decision. What's the evidence they use? And when did they use what evidence? It's traceability and explainability.”
♫
Said on The CPG Guys
“I have a 45-minute argument with AI where I give it conclusions and ask it to destroy them; it points out where I may be wrong.”
NP
Nigel Paine
The Mindtools L&D Podcast ·
“As they're answering things where I give them an assignment, automatically spawn a sub agent that traverses the vault for pertinent.”
MG
Mike Gennady
Intelligent Machines (Audio) ·
Moments like this, every Monday
The strongest new moments on your topics, in the speakers' own words. Free for three topics.
No card. No password. One-click unsubscribe.
Track a competitor?
Pro watches up to 25 names or phrases and emails you the morning after they are said.
See Pro, $29 a monthVerbatim quotes a short extract and links to the episode; the episode belongs to its publisher. Remove a show.