“The first one is if you get a higher starting rental yield. So those numbers that I just produced were based on a 3% starting yield. But if your starting yield is 7.6%, the amount you've got to put into that property is greatly reduced.”

Property Investment & Wealth Creation Australia | The Michael Yardney Podcast · Melbourne Property is 21% Undervalued - Here's Why | Stuart Wemyss

Play from 24:10
24:10

Audio streams from the publisher’s own feed. Verbatim does not host or copy it.

What was described

advocated using a higher starting rental yield (7.6% vs 3%) to reduce the capital needed for a property and offset the loss of negative gearing

starting yield 3%; starting yield 7.6%; negative cash flow < $10,000 per year

Said nearby on the same subject

“If you've got rental income positive on one asset… you can offset the negatives with the positive”
♫
Said on Asset Rich with Jack Henderson
Why it worked Share this moment
“You'll start by offsetting the short-term gains of the short-term losses, and then the long-term gains of the long-term losses”
♫
Said on Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing
How they work Share this moment
“I wouldn't use the funds to buy investment properties. I'd be using the funds to reduce my owner-occupied debt and then leveraging to buy investment properties.”
♫
Said on this is property
Contrarian take Share this moment
“We legislated a permanent loss carry back tax offset to support small businesses cash flow and resilience.”
♫
Said on Australian Parliament: House of Representatives
Why it worked Share this moment

Moments like this, every Monday

The strongest new moments on your topics, in the speakers' own words. Free for three topics.

No card. No password. One-click unsubscribe.

Track a competitor?

Pro watches up to 25 names or phrases and emails you the morning after they are said.

See Pro, $29 a month

Verbatim quotes a short extract and links to the episode; the episode belongs to its publisher. Remove a show.