“If you've got rental income positive on one asset… you can offset the negatives with the positive”
“The first one is if you get a higher starting rental yield. So those numbers that I just produced were based on a 3% starting yield. But if your starting yield is 7.6%, the amount you've got to put into that property is greatly reduced.”
Property Investment & Wealth Creation Australia | The Michael Yardney Podcast · Melbourne Property is 21% Undervalued - Here's Why | Stuart Wemyss
Audio streams from the publisher’s own feed. Verbatim does not host or copy it.
What was described
advocated using a higher starting rental yield (7.6% vs 3%) to reduce the capital needed for a property and offset the loss of negative gearing
starting yield 3%; starting yield 7.6%; negative cash flow < $10,000 per year
Said nearby on the same subject
“You'll start by offsetting the short-term gains of the short-term losses, and then the long-term gains of the long-term losses”
“I wouldn't use the funds to buy investment properties. I'd be using the funds to reduce my owner-occupied debt and then leveraging to buy investment properties.”
“We legislated a permanent loss carry back tax offset to support small businesses cash flow and resilience.”
Moments like this, every Monday
The strongest new moments on your topics, in the speakers' own words. Free for three topics.
No card. No password. One-click unsubscribe.
Track a competitor?
Pro watches up to 25 names or phrases and emails you the morning after they are said.
See Pro, $29 a monthVerbatim quotes a short extract and links to the episode; the episode belongs to its publisher. Remove a show.