“When work comes in, the intake agent… preparer agent does the first draft… reviewer agent checks that draft… a person always approves before anything reaches the client.”
“He set up a team of AI agents to check the other AI agents' work and then check it again. Every day, as I was working on the case, it would just go and check everything I'd see.”
The Fin · The AI reckoning arrives for Australia’s legal industry
Audio streams from the publisher’s own feed. Verbatim does not host or copy it.
What was described
ran an entire Fair Work Commission case using a team of AI agents, primarily ChatGPT Pro, to research, draft arguments, check citations, and generate courtroom submissions
$200 a month for ChatGPT Pro; about 20 days of personal work over an eight-month case; 10-15 AI agents running simultaneously
Said nearby on the same subject
“Number two, lawyers need to educate members of the firm about the difference between traditional legal research using Westlaw and the use of generative artificial intelligence”
“No, this has been primarily sponsor funded. ... the way these teams ... sponsorship revenue is the main generator”
“Lawyers researching cases, or citing cases that are made up because they just assume that those cases are real because the AI came up with them, but there's no verification involved”
Moments like this, every Monday
The strongest new moments on your topics, in the speakers' own words. Free for three topics.
No card. No password. One-click unsubscribe.
Track a competitor?
Pro watches up to 25 names or phrases and emails you the morning after they are said.
See Pro, $29 a monthVerbatim quotes a short extract and links to the episode; the episode belongs to its publisher. Remove a show.