“Some an opus and fable subagents, have them each do the estimates separately, have them each argue for their preferred numbers, and then have the main Claude running the analysis make a final decision.”

LessWrong (Curated & Popular) · "Towards The Autograntor" by Scott Alexander

Play from 18:38
18:38

Audio streams from the publisher’s own feed. Verbatim does not host or copy it.

What was described

use sub-agents (Opus, Fable, etc.) to produce independent forecasts, have them debate, then let the main Claude model make the final decision

Said nearby on the same subject

“‘We have really, really robust forecast models that we use to do all of our buying… we’re never going to be sending out flowers that have been sitting in our warehouse for days.’”
DB
Daily Blooms
Add To Cart: Australia’s eCommerce Show ·
Automation Share this moment
“I use voice notes to Claude. Claude takes my scores. The LLM as a judge, ranks them, and then puts them together in a presentation.”
♫
Said on How I AI
“Give the skill Grant Adversarial Estimate to Claude and ask it to install it in itself Then start a new session with Opus 5.5, Medium Effort and Prompt it with”
♫
Said on LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
How they work Share this moment
“First off, what is the decision? Let's define it. When does it have to be made? What is the cost for making it later as opposed to earlier?... what information do I have to have... who are the other stakeholders”
TR
Tony Robbins
Tony Robbins Podcast Daily ·
How they work Share this moment

Moments like this, every Monday

The strongest new moments on your topics, in the speakers' own words. Free for three topics.

No card. No password. One-click unsubscribe.

Track a competitor?

Pro watches up to 25 names or phrases and emails you the morning after they are said.

See Pro, $29 a month

Verbatim quotes a short extract and links to the episode; the episode belongs to its publisher. Remove a show.